8:00 – 12:45

Narrow Leadership, Higher Real Yields, and a Different Setup for Opportunity

Bill Miller IV, CFA, CMT

The headline market is still AI-led. But Bill’s argument is that investors should not confuse index strength with broad participation. In a world where capital has a real cost again, long-duration growth no longer has the same valuation tailwind it had during the zero-rate era. That creates a more constructive backdrop for value-oriented companies that generate cash today.

Key Takeaways:

  • The market may look strong at the index level, but leadership remains highly concentrated.
  • AI-related mega-cap names have driven a disproportionate share of returns.
  • This concentration can make passive exposure less diversified than investors may assume.
  • Higher real yields change the opportunity cost of capital.
  • When capital is no longer free, cash-generative, value-oriented companies become more interesting.
  • Bonds are more investable again, but so are companies generating meaningful cash today.

12:45 – 25:05

Concentration, Valuation Spreads, and the Case for Small/Mid-cap Value

Daniel Lysik, CFA

The small-cap value case is not simply “small caps are cheap.” The more important point is that concentration and valuation dispersion remain extreme. If market leadership broadens, the opportunity may shift toward companies that are underowned, underfollowed, and priced with low expectations.

Key Takeaways:

  • Market concentration remains extreme by historical standards.
  • Valuation spreads widened during the quarter.
  • The most expensive parts of the market have become significantly more expensive.
  • Small-cap indexes remain more diversified than the S&P 500, which has become increasingly concentrated in technology and communication services.
  • The valuation gap between large caps and small caps remains wide, even after better small-cap performance.
  • There’s potential for a multi-year small-cap value outperformance cycle if market leadership continues to broaden.

25:05 – 31:05

Funds Update: Differentiated Exposure, Income, and Active Share

Bill Miller IV, CFA, CMT

Bill talks about portfolio construction. If the next phase of the market is broader than the last one, then strategies that look meaningfully different from the S&P 500 may become more relevant. Active share matters because the opportunity is not simply owning “the market.” It is owning a different set of companies and return drivers.

Key Takeaways:

  • MVPL is designed to provide actively managed exposure to the S&P 500, shifting between leveraged and unleveraged positions based on the Adviser’s investment signals.
  • Miller Income Fund seeks income across companies’ capital structures.
  • MVPA is highly differentiated from the S&P 500 and built around active stock selection.
  • High active share can lead to different performance patterns from the market — for better and for worse.
  • In a broadening market, differentiated exposure may become more valuable.
  • If leadership rotates, investors may need portfolios that look different from the index.

31:20 – 37:00

Bitcoin: A Long-term Capital Denominator, Not a Short-term Trade

Bill Miller IV, CFA, CMT

Investors may need to think differently about where durable value can exist. Bitcoin remains volatile and controversial, but Bill’s view is that its fundamental case continues to strengthen as an alternative capital denominator.

  • Bill continues to view Bitcoin as a new form of capital denominator outside the traditional system.
  • The thesis is tied to fiscal deficits, money creation, and long-term monetary structure.
  • Bitcoin remains early in its adoption cycle.
  • Regulatory clarity could become an important catalyst for broader digital asset adoption.

TIME STAMP TBD

LIVE Q&A: Questions from the Audience

Bill Miller IV, CFA, CMT and Daniel Lysik, CFA. Moderated by David Yazdan

The Q&A covered Bitcoin and digital assets, including Bill Miller IV’s view on Bitcoin as a long-term capital denominator, Ethereum, stablecoins, blockchain applications, and indirect digital asset exposure. The team also addressed specific portfolio holdings and themes, including AI beneficiaries, Meta, housing-related names, turnarounds, free cash flow analysis, Treasury yields, and valuation opportunities in select small/mid-cap companies.

Summary

Our discussion kept returning to one central idea: the market’s headline return may not tell the full story.

AI leadership remains important. But concentration, valuation dispersion, higher real yields, and underappreciated opportunities in value, income, and small/mid-cap equities may be creating a different setup for the second half of the year.

For investors, the question is not whether the AI trade is over.
It is whether portfolios are prepared for what may come next if market participation continues to broaden.